Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 46

Thread: Ultimate Flytalk Wooly Bugger

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gauteng/Centurion
    Posts
    258

    Default Ultimate Flytalk Wooly Bugger

    Hi Gents
    I would like to build the ultimate woolly bugger and I thought I would ask everyone to help me brain storm until we can decide on a basic design.
    What do you regard as the ultimate in terms of material used, hooks, weight, heads/ no heads, colour and tecnique. I will build the fly and do a SBS on it once we have a pretty picture. The idea is to do the same with all the basic fly patterns we do and start an Ultimate fly section under the SBS.

    Now shoot!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    None
    Posts
    10,233

    Default

    Palmer with CDC instead of hackle.
    Mario Geldenhuys
    Smallstream fanatic, plus I do some other things that I can't tell you about

    "All the tips or magical insights in the world can't replace devotion, dedication, commitment, and gumption - and there is not secret in that" - Glenn Brackett

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Vanderbijlpark
    Posts
    109

    Default

    This thread should be interesting, I been tying some buggers this week trying to come up with something a bit different been mixing sparkle dubbing and cdc together in a dubbing loop and then making a rope with the hackle and loop which is quite nice.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Boksburg
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Mario
    I do not agree.( This post might get long.) If you use hackle you disturb more water fishing deep and the lateral line of the fish picks it up easier than CDC which is soft. Hackle is cheaper but that would not count on the ultimate fly.
    I think CDC has other effects like if your woolly bugger is fished higher in the water column you will trap air which will be effective. So now it's horses for coarses?
    Jannie

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Parys, Free State
    Posts
    9,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glans View Post
    Mario
    I do not agree.( This post might get long.) If you use hackle you disturb more water fishing deep and the lateral line of the fish picks it up easier than CDC which is soft. Hackle is cheaper but that would not count on the ultimate fly.
    I think CDC has other effects like if your woolly bugger is fished higher in the water column you will trap air which will be effective. So now it's horses for coarses?
    Jannie
    I don't agree Jannie, you get pretty long CDC feathers hey (Swisscdc) depends on what you do with them and how you incorporate them into your fly. Here's a thought; what if your CDC is UV treated and your cheap chinese hackle not? Which will reflect more light? It could be argued that treated cdc with an assumed lesser action is more valuable in deep water than cheap hackle that does nothing other than wiggle a bit more (assuming your hackle is 1.5 times the gape of the hook or more otherwise it won't have that much more action) in water than CDC.
    Last edited by Gerrit Viljoen; 20-02-14 at 12:34 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gauteng/Centurion
    Posts
    258

    Default

    So what we are saying is basically we need an upper water coloum and a deep UWB( Ultimate Woolly Bugger). The deep one needs to push more water( hen hackel) and the surface one needs to wiggle(CDC)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    3,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glans View Post
    Mario
    I do not agree.( This post might get long.) If you use hackle you disturb more water fishing deep and the lateral line of the fish picks it up easier than CDC which is soft. Hackle is cheaper but that would not count on the ultimate fly.
    I think CDC has other effects like if your woolly bugger is fished higher in the water column you will trap air which will be effective. So now it's horses for coarses?
    Jannie
    for dirty water or fishing at night I am with Jannie - a hackled woolly bugger will displace more water and attract more fish. For clearer water I would go with a mixed cdc and brushed dubbing body. The question might then be if the cdc and dubbing version could be called a woolly bugger?
    Last edited by dlampert; 20-02-14 at 12:39 PM.
    “Apparently people don't like the truth, but I do like it; I like it because it upsets a lot of people. If you show them enough times that their arguments are bullshit, then maybe just once, one of them will say, 'Oh! Wait a minute - I was wrong.' I live for that happening. Rare, I assure you” ― Lemmy Kilmister

    Reap the Whirlwind - WM

    Paradise = A 3wt Rod & a fist full of someone else's #32 parachutes

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    None
    Posts
    10,233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlampert View Post
    for dirty water or fishing at night I am with Jannie - a hackled woolly bugger will displace more water and attract more fish. For clearer water I would go with a mixed cdc and brushed dubbing body. The question might then be if the cdc and dubbing version could be called a woolly bugger?
    What about adding those little plastic cone thingies to push water and add noise?
    Mario Geldenhuys
    Smallstream fanatic, plus I do some other things that I can't tell you about

    "All the tips or magical insights in the world can't replace devotion, dedication, commitment, and gumption - and there is not secret in that" - Glenn Brackett

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Azania
    Posts
    2,137

    Default

    Wouldn't the targeted specie dictate the type of Wooly Bugger?
    What are you trying to imitate? Baitfish or some huge fly?
    How deep do you want to fish it?
    Flash or no flash?
    Eyes or not?

    Various types:
    woolly-bugger.jpg
    bugger-brownleaded.jpg
    264e37ea2e6662926c7743a62c00bbcc281a4a88aff4030527c92f6d96563d22.jpg

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    None
    Posts
    10,233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glans View Post
    Mario
    I do not agree.( This post might get long.) If you use hackle you disturb more water fishing deep and the lateral line of the fish picks it up easier than CDC which is soft. Hackle is cheaper but that would not count on the ultimate fly.
    I think CDC has other effects like if your woolly bugger is fished higher in the water column you will trap air which will be effective. So now it's horses for coarses?
    Jannie
    The movement CDC provides will outweigh (imo) the amount of noise the fly makes with a hackled rib.
    Mario Geldenhuys
    Smallstream fanatic, plus I do some other things that I can't tell you about

    "All the tips or magical insights in the world can't replace devotion, dedication, commitment, and gumption - and there is not secret in that" - Glenn Brackett

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •