Chris,
You know the thing is, I don't think you can rightly blame the hook removal process and barbs for all the damage caused to a fishes mouth. Such is the nature of a hook and of the act of fighting a fish, that in some cases damage to the fish is inevitable, barbless or not. The fish you guys are catching in the streams and rivers are delicate little buggers. Applying pressure to the hook during the fight has got to result in some tearing, depending on where the fish is hooked. Also, with the way those little buggers fight to get free, generally never staying still for a second and jumping around all over the place, means they get hurt quite easily.
As I explained in my previous post, I do still fish barbed on some of my flies, however I reckon on around 6 out of 10 fish I catch, I actually don't physically have to remove the fly from the fishes mouth, it comes out by itself during netting. The rest are easily removed, simply by reversing it out the way it went in, no drama. In fact I actually can't remember the last time I struggled to get a hook out, to the point that my forceps are lying in the bottom of my bag. I think.
Point is, I don't reckon the barb isn't solely to blame for injuring your little fishy friends !
I imagine that fly fishers down in the Cape of all places are well aware of the C&R rules and thus probably fish barbless as do you. And yet you still say you see fish down there with damaged mouths, bits of skin trailing etc. I reckon its more from them being played too hard or poor handling of them prior to release that does most of the damage.
Bookmarks