Congrats on Hookjaw status o wise one
Kev
I would'nt claim that cane is superior to carbon or modern materials. Just different. There is also a certain satisfaction in using a rod which my great grandfather could have used. Makes me realise that, apart from weight, stream rods have not improved much over the last 150 years.
Cane is very sensitive and you feel every movement of the fish in the water. Rod feels "alive".
I read Schweiberts chapter on cane rods in "TROUT" and have wanted one ever since. But it's important to get the right cane rod. Right taper, action etc. The rod I imported is a copy of a Garrison 201E, designated a fast, medium action (by cane standards).
You're welcome to try it sometime. Ask Darryl for his independant comment - he tried the rod and caught a trout with it on Sat.
Silk lines have a performance advantage due to much smaller diameter and hence reduced wind resistance (for the same weight). But that I'll only be able to confirm this weekend.
Congrats on Hookjaw status o wise one
It's not in the catching, it's in the learning something new.
view albums at. http://www.flytalk.co.za/forum/album.php?u=659
hear hear, congrats Neil! Now there are two mean mouthed hookjawed son of a fish on here...yay!!
Thanks guys, maybe i'll trim the eyebrows a touch now!
Someone mention my name?
Neil
I contacted the guys that Headwaters get their rods and blanks from, and hope to hear from them soon. So, your next rod you can get from me
Mario Geldenhuys
Smallstream fanatic, plus I do some other things that I can't tell you about
"All the tips or magical insights in the world can't replace devotion, dedication, commitment, and gumption - and there is not secret in that" - Glenn Brackett
Go for it - the rods work well. Think you'll have a limited market though. Very few tradtionalists here it seems!
Bookmarks