Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: What Fly Line is best...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gauteng
    Posts
    6,299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaXiMuM View Post
    Tested a Shark Skin on Sunday with Dizzy...

    The Best line i have ever thrown...

    Mike
    And the most expensive....

    Dean showed me the line burns those Sharkskin lines gave him on the trip to Argentina, when big fish ran off with line. I dunno...too expensive for me...one rock or branch and the line is ruined. Value for money...the GPX and Trout Taper is the best in my opinion.
    Or put it this way...the Sharkskin line is not going to make me a better fly fisherman or catch more fish for me.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Western Cape
    Posts
    7,524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    And the most expensive....

    Dean showed me the line burns those Sharkskin lines gave him on the trip to Argentina, when big fish ran off with line. I dunno...too expensive for me...one rock or branch and the line is ruined. Value for money...the GPX and Trout Taper is the best in my opinion.
    Or put it this way...the Sharkskin line is not going to make me a better fly fisherman or catch more fish for me.
    Not true hey Michael, the sharkskin line is also touted as being the toughest and most durable on the market. About the better fisherman bit. remember, it is all about the combination of things that each give a 1% advantage.
    eg. good boots help wade quieter, good rod, gives that slightly smoother cast. sharper hooks, slightly better hookup rate, sharkskin line, just presents slightly better.... add them all up, all of a sudden, your a better angler.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Gauteng
    Posts
    6,299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Not true hey Michael, the sharkskin line is also touted as being the toughest and most durable on the market. About the better fisherman bit. remember, it is all about the combination of things that each give a 1% advantage.
    eg. good boots help wade quieter, good rod, gives that slightly smoother cast. sharper hooks, slightly better hookup rate, sharkskin line, just presents slightly better.... add them all up, all of a sudden, your a better angler.
    To me the sharkskin is a disadvantage. Paying this kinda money for a flyline is just crazy. Think about it....man it's bloody crazy!!!!! R400 extra PER LINE is NOT going to turn me into a better fisherman. Just as my Z-Axis is not going to make me cast twice as good as a rod that costs half the price.
    So maybe yes...the line will make me fish 1% better as you mention...it's not worth paying R400 extra, that's for sure!

    Plus...here are my other negative points about it: The "sharkskin" effect on the line is going to pick up dirt on Vaal quickly...or any river...much quicker than slick line.
    The wind resistance must be horrendous...

    Plus point....ZERO memory...but then again, the GPX and Trout Taper has almost zero too...again not worth R400 extra.

    And yes...fish take you around sharp rocks, branches, etc etc...and the line is defintely NOT so much more abrasive resistant that it won't cut and ruin.
    And I KNOW it will happen to someone...put a new Sharkskin line on...few fish later the line gets cut off. He will not be a happy man...

    I know some anglers with low-end equipment and tekkies on when fishing, that will outfish guys with top-end tackle. a Line that costs almost double the price is not going to make anyone double the fisherman he currently is.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Western Cape
    Posts
    7,524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    To me the sharkskin is a disadvantage. Paying this kinda money for a flyline is just crazy. Think about it....man it's bloody crazy!!!!! R400 extra PER LINE is NOT going to turn me into a better fisherman. Just as my Z-Axis is not going to make me cast twice as good as a rod that costs half the price.
    So maybe yes...the line will make me fish 1% better as you mention...it's not worth paying R400 extra, that's for sure!

    Plus...here are my other negative points about it: The "sharkskin" effect on the line is going to pick up dirt on Vaal quickly...or any river...much quicker than slick line.
    The wind resistance must be horrendous...

    Plus point....ZERO memory...but then again, the GPX and Trout Taper has almost zero too...again not worth R400 extra.

    And yes...fish take you around sharp rocks, branches, etc etc...and the line is defintely NOT so much more abrasive resistant that it won't cut and ruin.
    And I KNOW it will happen to someone...put a new Sharkskin line on...few fish later the line gets cut off. He will not be a happy man...

    I know some anglers with low-end equipment and tekkies on when fishing, that will outfish guys with top-end tackle. a Line that costs almost double the price is not going to make anyone double the fisherman he currently is.
    Ok, well you talking about the vaal, I wasn't. It certainly wont give you any advantage on the Vaal and you are probably right about the other things as well. I have only used it on the streams, and I definatly think it provides an advantage in precision dry fly casting. as for the dirt, i certainly wont be fishing a R900 line in any water where it can pick up dirt. I agree, most top end tackle is probably unneccessary on the Vaal.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Royal Ascot Milnerton
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Have also read up on a snowbee floating line which seems to be doing very well overseas.

    Does anyone know if one can get these here ?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Jowies
    Posts
    716

    Default

    I dont want to diss the shark line (as the read up sound very good) but geeee wiskerzzzz they are over priced
    If and when the price comes down I might think about it but until then Ill be catching fish with the regular fly line thats half the price and still catches fish.
    NOTICE :

    If you notice this notice you will notice that this notice
    is not worth noticing thank you for
    NOTICING

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    CPT
    Posts
    2,535

    Default

    So what does this line cost? cos I recall paying R600 for my SA XPS!
    Daryl Human

    The solution to any problem -- work, love, money, whatever -- is to go fishing, and the worse the problem, the longer the trip should be. --John Gierach

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    2,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    Dean showed me the line burns those Sharkskin lines gave him on the trip to Argentina, when big fish ran off with line.
    I reckon over 100 fish a day, of anything between 10 and 24 lbs will do that, no matter what line.

    You should have seen my fingers after just 17 fish at Mt A this year, and that was with my GPX.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    2,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deneys View Post
    I dont want to diss the shark line (as the read up sound very good) but geeee wiskerzzzz they are over priced
    If and when the price comes down I might think about it but until then Ill be catching fish with the regular fly line thats half the price and still catches fish.
    And you base this opinion on what ? How can you say its overpriced if you've never even tried it ?

    I thought the same thing, until I actually fished with one.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    2,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dizzy View Post
    So what does this line cost? cos I recall paying R600 for my SA XPS!

    950.00 Ront

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •